6B\\2'\\m","A":"metacurriculum ๐","D":"c0","E":1743035564325,"F":"md","G":1745012096602,"H":"[[ambiguity]] is explosive\n โ \nambiguity overwhelms memory โ people simplify communication to free up memory and improve the possibility of certainty\n โ \n###### people observe in anticipation of certainty\nโ \n[[iris]] communicates for certainty's sake\n โ \nc0 is metacurriculum or curriculum syntaxis, for systematic flow of [[syntax]] from assumptions through curricula\n โ \nmetacurriculum's win condition is [[interesting communication|c1#observer_is_ready_to_communicate]]\n
\n[[meta|glossary]]curriculum communicates the mechanics of iris, curricula, and [Feather Wiki](https://feather.wiki/?page=features)\n โ \nlearn to communicate with iris [[here|tutorial]]\n"},{"C":"I0m>:}}Qa","A":"autocurriculum โค๏ธ","D":"c1","E":1742710603256,"H":"[[metacurriculum|c0]]\n & \n###### observer is ready to communicate\nโ \nself alignment is possible\n โ \nc1 is autocurriculum or curriculum disco, for self observation\n & \nautocurriculum's win condition is [[articulate accuracy|c2#observer_is_correctly_predicting_second_order_consequences]]\n\nc1's foundational question is \"what is good?\" or \"what is true?\" or \"what is love?\" or \"what is life?\" ...one of those types of questions :P","F":"md","G":1744563807429},{"C":"BYKGt0.uF","A":"cocurriculum ๐งก","D":"c2","E":1742711482252,"H":"[[autocurriculum|c1]]\n & \n###### observer is correctly predicting second order consequences\nโ \ndyadic alignment is possible\n โ \nc2 is cocurriculum or curriculum consensus, for social observation\n โ \ncocurriculum's win condition is [[social alignment|c3#observer_is_aligned_with_another]]\n\nc2's foundational question is \"who has [[personhood]]?\"","F":"md","G":1744989238649},{"C":"%0w.\"_zAY","A":"polycurriculum ๐","D":"c3","E":1742744789528,"H":"[[cocurriculum|c2]]\n & \n###### observer is aligned with another\nโ \ncultural alignment is possible\n โ \nc3 is [[poly|polychotomy]]curriculum or curriculum collectivus, for building and directing collective force\n โ \npolycurriculum's win condition is [[local alignment|c4#observer_is_aligned_with_a_group]]\n\nc3's foundational question is \"how can we align conflicting access needs?\"","F":"md","G":1744989250637},{"C":"I!GZg2tz:","A":"hypercurriculum ๐","D":"c4","E":1742754343858,"H":"[[polycurriculum|c3]]\n & \n###### observer is aligned with a group\nโ \nsocietal alignment is possible\n โ \nc4 is [[hyper|glossary]]curriculum or curriculum memoria, for global alignment\n โ \nhypercurriculum's win condition is creation of [[unicurriculum]]๐\n\nc4's foundational question is \"when is the use of force constructive?\"","F":"md","G":1744989261665},{"C":"[?^n}tYV'","A":"assumptions","D":"assumptions","E":1742755064712,"H":"when assumptions change, a new [[encyclopedia|scholecule]] is in order\n\nany sub[[text]] implying metaphysical claims in assumptions is unintentional","F":"md","G":1744938645932,"I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"B]WPj<,Eq","A":"beliefs","D":"beliefs","E":1742755156533,"H":"'beliefs' is a direct response to [[assumptions]], and answers to the metaphysics of [[curricula|c0]]","F":"md","G":1744563581348,"I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"I(v\"NGECl","A":"foundational assumptions","D":"foundational_assumptions","E":1742708496487,"H":"nothing is certain [[โ|syntax]] anything is possible\n\ncertainty is gradient; binaries are hallucinations; the only constant is change","G":1744563570390,"F":"md","I":"[?^n}tYV'"},{"C":"BA,ynj57b","A":"more assumptions","D":"more_assumptions","E":1742708667122,"H":"[[anything is possible|foundational_assumptions]] โ observation is possible โ [[observation happens|foundational_beliefs]]","G":1745002165409,"F":"md","I":"I(v\"NGECl"},{"C":"QG% !\\fQW","A":"foundational beliefs","D":"foundational_beliefs","E":1742708847455,"H":"[[observation happens|assumptions]] โ observation separates [[observer|glossary]] from [[observed|glossary]]\n โ \nseparation is a [[meta|glossary]]physics of observation\n โ \n[[separation is ambiguous|communication]]\n\nobservation implies observer, but the exchange between observer and observed is as easily interpreted as a connection as it is separation\n โ \nfoundational beliefs are dubious","G":1745017569571,"F":"md","I":"B]WPj<,Eq"},{"C":"gsBRT\\puv","A":"communication","D":"communication","E":1744502418246,"H":"[[separation is ambiguous|foundational_beliefs]]\n โ \nalignment is a challenge of communication\n โ \npeople communicate by [[choosing|glossary]] a shared method of communication, volunteering, then responding\n โ \nto account for English [[ambiguity]], [[iris]] limits communication to the [[syntax]] and [[foundations|assumptions]] of [[metacurriculum|c0]]\n\nPS random implicit beliefs contaminate language with deception, snobbery, and violence. as an English monoglot, I don't know which metaphysics I inherited and why. I do know that speaking in future and past tense implies that time passes, capitalizing letters implies identity, and that is weird to Me","F":"md","G":1745018366714,"I":"B]WPj<,Eq"},{"C":"t3%z}nXX ","A":"iris","D":"iris","E":1744320465781,"F":"md","G":1745010775362,"H":"iris is a Wiki โ iris is always in development, currently in alpha โ infrastructure is still emerging and largely inaccessible\n โ \niris will reach beta when syntax is systematic and universal\n โ \niris will be whole when assumptions โ hypercurriculum is a coherently linked explanation of all the glossary terms. currently, the only way to complete [[tutorial]]'s instructions is to follow links through the curriculum pages, or the chotomy pages\n\nPS public schools and universities separate curriculum by topic, leaving the vast majority of observation and alignment out of scope. iris makes everything observable, separating curriculum by scope, and making informed foundational choices. starting small with self alignment, each curriculum's win condition is an order of magnitude more complicated than the last\n โ \n[[autocurriculum|c1]] is a subset of [[cocurriculum|c2]] is a subset of [[polycurriculum|c3]] is a subset of [[hypercurriculum|c4]] and so on, separating by reach, not arbitration of relevance\n \nPPS also, public schools enforce attendance (which is whack) so while attendance is the way through public school, skilling up, paring down, pacing exposure, and tolerating vulnerability seems like the way through iris","I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"'L_]*ok>l","A":"glossary","D":"glossary","E":1743034964739,"H":"person โค๏ธ observer\n โ \nmemory ๐งก the observed\n โ \nboundary ๐ observable separation\n โ \nhypertext ๐ external reference\n โ \nchoice ๐ access across boundaries\n โ \nalignment ๐ฉต consensual boundaries\n โ \nmetastuff ๐ internal reference","F":"md","G":1745004376272,"I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"+b$=scvTS","A":"syntax","D":"syntax","E":1743290147715,"H":"[[iris]] ๐ organizes [[ambiguity]] like a compound of atoms\n โ \nPages โค๏ธ are atoms, the nuclear unit of their [[curriculum|c0]]\n โ \ncurriculum ๐งก is the metaphorical compound\n โ \n[[scholecule]] ๐ is the combination of such compounds\n โ \n[[text]] ๐ is the nuclear unit of a Page\n โ \nsymbols ๐ฉต and other stuff ๐ shown below, cooperate ambiguously to form text, as nucleons cooperate ambiguously to form a nucleus\n\nanything under these lines ๐ clarify English sub[[text]], without contributing to the logic that flows between Pages\n \nโ conditionals split claims, stating that if the former is true, then the following must also be true (narrated as \"then\" or \"only if\")\n \n& ampersands separate claims, as do periods between sentences, line breaks, and Pages\n \n\" straight quotes mark [[hypertext|glossary]], as do capitalized letters, fonts, and links\n \n[[links|iris]] without the superscript reference iris\n \n[links](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hypertext) with the superscript reference text beyond the current scope of iris\n \nPS postscripts are utterly irrelevant please ignore","G":1744999992311,"F":"md","I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"CK\\tKUPCy","A":"tutorial","D":"tutorial","E":1744136963426,"H":"feel free to start with [[assumptions]], and follow links to [[unicurriculum]]. currently only a few loose link circuits bind everything together, but more could be created\n\nI find iris pairs well with housekeeping: progress in one correlates with progress in the other. bookmark progress with [[status_update]] by updating and moving or copying it to relevant curricula. clarify ambiguity at [[glossary]] and [[syntax]], reinforce the connections throughout iris with [flashcards](https://ankiweb.net): each 'โ' indicating either side of one card\n โ \nnote any [[disagreement|communication]], [[ambiguity]], and [[access needs|access]]. if they're too numerous for comfort, We might have conflicting [[assumptions]]\n โ \nEdit and Save Your copy of this Wiki, and [upload](https://feather.wiki/?page=publishing) the new encyclopedia to grow the [[scholecule]]","F":"md","G":1745017050841,"I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"uNq5ypPTd","A":"observation","D":"observation","E":1743718175895,"F":"md","G":1745019571400,"H":"[[observation]] accounts for [[ambiguity]] & [[memory]] separates past and present โ observation is limited to one of multiple moments\n โ \n[[the present moment is explosive|prediction]]\n โ \nobservation is automatic & observation is irrelevant to language\n โ \nevidence of relevant concepts like identity, conscience, mind, life, self, are not communicable\n\nself observation is looking for the boundaries of identity: [[noticing human tendency to talk about their body in the third person, observable separation between eyeballs and other sense organs, or loci of identity|dichotomy]], [[distractions|trichotomy]], [[motion blur|polychotomy]]. self observation helps form an identity with whom to progress to [[cocurriculum|c2]]","I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":"qaH?s}T2I","A":"memory","D":"memory","E":1744087448708,"H":"[[ambiguity]] is explosive & memory accounts for ambiguity\n โ \nmemory separates direct observation from metaphysical noise*\n โ \nobserving memories, and choosing which ones represent aligned choices, reinforces identity\n โ \n[[observation]] is complex\n\n*the past and future, for example\n \nPS a mind palace is a routine of observing sequences of memories of direct observations. works well with analogous routines, like daily commutes through a sequence of rooms and landscapes","G":1745019305971,"F":"md","I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":"{bWj[NdVQ","A":"certainty is possible","D":"certainty_is_possible","E":1743146623809,"H":"[[metacurriculum|c0]]\n โ \nstrategic communication can simulate certainty\n & \ncertainty is a skill of [[prediction]]\n\ncertainty is most easily experienced by means of direct observation, but accurate linguistic description of the experience seems impossible โ it's possible observation is unlimited & observation is certain","F":"md","G":1745017953341,"I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":"_3J1?e}6h","A":"scholecule","D":"scholecule","E":1744138095420,"H":"[[curriculum consensus|c3]] & [[access]] โ misalignment is possible\n โ \n[[iris is fungible|tutorial]] in case observers really are plural, separate, and interested in alignment. encyclopedias in discourse is scholecule. scholecule is a platform for boundarycraft and building collective force through study\n & \n[conflict bowl](https://medium.com/@camxfree/a-field-guide-to-conflict-bowl-3ae3b0227e20) is a workshop of comparable scale, for resolving misalignment peacefully\n & \n[Francesco Cirrilo's Pomodoro Technique](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pomodoro_Technique) is a boundarycraft of comparable scale, for timing and focus \n\ncollective force emerges from alignment, which, on this scale, is supported by historical situation (eg. occupied territory โ discuss land acknowledgment), boundarycraft (eg. discuss plans and corresponding access needs), action (eg. discuss encyclopedias, accommodate access needs)","F":"md","G":1744575308618,"I":"%0w.\"_zAY"},{"C":"yy3gO_(.6","A":"cause","D":"cause","E":1743526616689,"H":"[[prediction]] โ You are committed to the past \n โ \n\"cue and response\" has just as much explanatory power as \"cause and effect\": both are unfalsifiable speculation\n\njokes affect people: they might respond positively or negatively. social cause and effect is always fun to observe, but a good sense of humour makes it safer. when people expect ironic pretext in advance of an ironic joke, they're more likely to put their energy into enjoying the joke rather than taking offense or criticizing it. positive social response is [attunement](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attachment_theory), alignment, harmony. it seems challenging but worthwhile to maintain over time :)","F":"md","G":1744913189108,"I":"BYKGt0.uF"},{"C":"@'yG#G4+Q","A":"power","D":"power","E":1743526786667,"H":"Yuval Noah Harari criticizes Marxism as a lens that only sees the world in terms of power. but indeed, power, often euphemized as [[energy]], animates life, and dictates whether consent can be persuasively withdrawn. power therefore has foundational influence & certainty is the analogue for power in iris โ certainty is a violent force\n & \nYNH is correct in that life is more than just power: it is also possibility, that which can be taken away by violence. storyline plays a role in alignment by making separate people, who enjoy the same storyline, mutually predictable. storyline is not a chicken or egg situation: before stories existed, a powerful person spoke and then their words went viral & [[assumptions]] and [[beliefs]] are analogue for storyline in iris\n โ \nassumptions and beliefs power boundarycraft & [feather wiki](https://feather.wiki) \"powers\" iris & memory powers choice\n\nsee [Nexus'](https://www.ynharari.com/book/nexus/) final chapter and epilogue for Harari's take. he also has good words on stories in an earlier chapter","F":"md","G":1744930985182,"I":"I!GZg2tz:"},{"C":"Az,yb]wlY","A":"Marx","D":"marx","E":1743527087546,"H":"Marxism is like Newtonism or Christianity in that a random assortment of beliefs (whose only binding agent is a dead person who allegedly shared them) is assigned a religious context.\n โ \nupdating and abandoning each of Marx's ideas on a case by case basis, is better long term strategy than reacting to evangelical reactionaries with equally dogmatic takes\n\ninspired by Chomsky's take in [Understanding Power](http://understandingpower.org), Chapter 7, Header \"Marxist 'Theory' and Intellectual Fakery\"","F":"md","G":1744517778946,"I":"I!GZg2tz:"},{"C":"VpP\"3v33[","A":"access","D":"access","E":1744324512266,"H":"[[beliefs]] โ observation is not guaranteed\n & \n[[foundational assumptions]] โ access is limited by memory\n & \n[[metacurriculum|c0]] โ access needs correspond to desire & desire for alignment is central to iris\n โ \niris needs universal [[communication]] to function accessibly\n\naccess is power: what counts as communication depends on boundaries, reinforced by consent","I":"BYKGt0.uF","F":"md","G":1744931418319},{"C":"c*Rt&lQ&%","A":"You","D":"you","E":1744327383204,"H":"[[observation is complex|memory]]\n โ \nYou believe You are observing right now โ You agree with iris' [[foundational beliefs]]\n & \n[[foundational beliefs]] & communication is observable โ communication separates [[people|glossary]]\n โ \ncommunication is the root of mis[[alignment|glossary]]\n\nobserver accesses a memory (in breath) โ observer communicates the memory as freely as their memory allows (out breath)","F":"md","G":1745019630757,"I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":"n*pZUp690","A":"text","D":"text","E":1744340405580,"H":"a claim is an example of text that can be parsed for pretext, subtext, and context. pretext is linguistic communication of memory; context, the memory in question; and subtext, metalinguistic communication of said memory\n โ \npredicting communication is a way to enjoy a little hit of [[social proof]], and meet [[cocurriculum's win condition|c3#observer_is_aligned_with_another]]. subtext can be deduced โ pretext and context are certain. predicting context based on pretext and subtext is also possible if trust is high enough. subtext and pretext are simultaneous, so if one wasn't observed, neither was the other. this arrangement precludes any possibility of deduction, but context can have so much explanatory power that the other two remain possible to correctly predict\n\nthis mental model forms a [[trichotomy]]","F":"md","G":1745018668814,"I":"BYKGt0.uF"},{"C":"3el'Jl9hu","A":"prediction","D":"prediction","E":1744344878049,"H":"observation is limited & memories are generated in the present to be observed\n โ \nthe past is fake\n โ \nthe big bang is still [[unfolding|sequence]]\n\n[[combustion|energy]], observed as multiplication, is more observable than addition. look for it! fs.blog explains second order thinking, and, importantly, how to articulate predictions, [here](https://fs.blog/second-order-thinking), which makes [[curriculum disco's win condition|c2#observer_is_correctly_predicting_second_order_consequences]] approachable","F":"md","G":1745018489452,"I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":"Z`ia\\V>u1","A":"dichotomy","D":"dichotomy","E":1744346717278,"H":"[[foundational assumptions]] โ quantity is uncertain\n โ \nbinary logic is hubristic and reductive & dichotomy has epistemic humility and explanatory power\n โ \nthe extremes of darkness and lightness expose contrast, not opposition. Carl Jung said \"no tree can grow to heaven unless its roots reach down to hell.\" this doesn't imply a binary but a dichotomy, or contrast. contrast can sometimes be reduced to an observable boundary\n\n'โ' is an example of a dichotomy! the more of the former is so, the more the following is so โ 'โ' communicates separation between a dichotomous former and latter. dichotomy is the simplest legitimate case of choice. this is an excellent place to start philosophy","I":"I0m>:}}Qa","F":"md","G":1745018620319},{"C":"Th}~U+P_S","A":"trichotomy","D":"trichotomy","E":1744502055810,"H":"[[dichotomy]] exposes contrast between two variables\n โ \ntrichotomy exposes contrast between three variables\n โ \nYou and Me talking is a trichotomy: You, Me, and My memories\n\nobserving the extremes of colour, valence, or ideology exposes an observer to [[polychotomy]]. self observation exposes an observer to [[monochotomy]]. trichotomy is the second most simple case of choice","F":"md","G":1745018799160,"I":"BYKGt0.uF"},{"C":"H{Z9โ \nearning money harvests power\n โ \nspending money forces power around\n\nas far as budgeting goes, it makes sense to take cues from the economy. accumulate enough money to get those basic needs met, then send any spare money to folks in poorer (read: less powerful) countries so they can stretch it for their own specific purposes. then, focus on the specific purposes of folks in political proximity, with whom You can align through communication and observation","I":"I!GZg2tz:","F":"md","G":1744662879662},{"C":"[-41K-O;u","A":"energy","D":"energy","E":1744525373343,"H":"energy is possibility, wielded by observers to observe, rich folks to exploit, poor folks to budget\n\nmaybe [[observation]] is present energy & [[memory]] is past energy & [[money]] is future energy","I":"I!GZg2tz:","F":"md","G":1745019208039},{"C":" aR-mXfVd","A":"social proof","D":"social_proof","E":1744525736113,"H":"dyadic connections between humans are inseparable from the community that connected them\n โ \na coffee date with a girl from a dating app is a coffee date with a girl and the dating app\n โ \nif a joke lands well, this is evidence that the joke is rewarded by girl and dating app, not just girl\n\nbeing with someone else means being watched by a huge multitude of people. watching another person's reaction to voluntary behaviour is the only way to make conclusions about the value of that behavior; [appeal to popularity is not a fallacy in this case](https://www.fallacyfiles.org/bandwagn.html)","I":"BYKGt0.uF","F":"md","G":1744527258348},{"C":"gsbL&AsWT","A":"personhood","D":"personhood","E":1744559119528,"H":"[[foundational assumptions]] โ communication is possible & You the observer might not be the only one making observations\n โ \npersonhood assignment is uncertain\n โ \nYou claim personhood & agree that vulnerability is scary โ You are responsible for assuming personhood (and withdrawal of consent) for anything You feel separate from and out of communication with\n\n[[social proof]] is not an indicator of personhood: Your inability to communicate with anything You assume is separate from Yourself has no bearing on its personhood & people deserve to wield enough [[power]] to successfully withdraw consent\n \nPS one eye is one observer โ most bodies contain at least two people (and if vulnerability is a problem, a single human could meet cocurriculum's win condition within themself, or maybe try aligning with a pet, or even a silverfish... they're supposed to be a very ancient people and it looks like all they want to do is muck around; very playful, hide and seek vibes, actually)","I":"BYKGt0.uF","F":"md","G":1745020302906},{"C":"2s-l%H77Y","A":"polychotomy","D":"polychotomy","E":1744559287263,"H":"[[dichotomy]] exposes contrast between two variables\n โ \n[[trichotomy]] exposes contrast between three variables\n โ \npolychotomy exposes contrast between a network of variables\n\npolychotomy complexity. for example, washing dishes: people set boundaries between themselves and dishpits altogether, assuming others will take care of it. observation of water interacting with self, and hard, slippery surfaces over time, is chaotic. it's inherently complex even at first glance, but coming to terms with the social boundaries at play is a whole new level of complexity. who and what counts as clean? when are You done washing dishes? what counts as a dish? \"why isn't anyone helping me?\"","F":"md","G":1745019014016,"I":"%0w.\"_zAY"},{"C":")Q+ _YEi~","A":"ambiguity","D":"ambiguity","E":1744649654884,"H":"[[iris organizes observation by curricula|communication]] & communication is ambiguous\n โ \nambiguity creeps into curriculum as it outgrows [[metacurriculum|c0]]\n โ \nambiguity is explosive\n โ \n[[ambiguity overwhelms memory|c0]]\n\niris communicates in English, one of many languages that just keep growing. [redefining words](https://fallacyfiles.org/redefine.html) in the [[glossary]] necessitates the habit of forgetting, or replacing more traditional and complicated senses of the word in question. I hope this ultimately makes iris easier, not harder, to understand and eventually translate into okulo, ุนูู, ็ผ, xฬฑรกngii, ojo, ๐๏ธ, and so on <3","F":"md","G":1745011964889,"I":"B]WPj<,Eq"},{"C":"|@(X N\\&7","A":"monochotomy","D":"monochotomy","E":1744660475948,"H":"self reference\n\nan atomic encyclopedia is a glossary: each Page title is to its content as [[glossary]] is to its glosses\n โ \n[[foundational assumptions]] โ hypertext is the only force driving iris โ iris will inevitably recurse back into uncertainty ","I":"I!GZg2tz:","F":"md","G":1744738956644},{"C":"kp}q'`a}+","A":"choice","D":"choice","E":1744679049622,"H":"volunteering is as automatic as observation & both can be limited by separation\n โ \nto do a choice, be alone, self observe, predict what will change in a context with more exposure, connection, and vulnerability, then decide on a context to go to. optionally, keep observing based on the prediction\n\nheartbeat, laughter, microexpression, observation, most and maybe all human behaviours are as automatic as an ant colony's process of gathering a nest and exploring for food โ accepting [[cause and effect|cause]] instead of [[communication]] entails accepting that free will is fake, and choice is an iteration of evolution, the big bang, or something outside Your control","I":"I0m>:}}Qa","F":"md","G":1745018408560},{"C":"7hs\"M:cW$","A":"sequence","D":"sequence","E":1744739113573,"H":"[[the big bang is unfolding|prediction]]\n โ \nthe present moment is a consequence of the past\n & \nthe past, present, and future form a sequence\n\ntime is a sequence (or a hodgepodge) of observations, maybe the first metaphysical claim to follow from separation. prediction depends on the sequence of time","F":"md","G":1745019940042,"I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":"L>u 92X1X","A":"status update","D":"status_update","E":1744740579310,"H":"[[memory]] โ [[choice]] \n โ \n[[prediction]] โ observation\n โ \nobservation โ memory\n & \nseparation and memory are a basic metaphysics to get through curricula. explain them with limits: observation, personhood; time: prediction, choice; power: alignment, consent, access, introducing each term as late as possible, so as to stretch the use of each word as far as it will go <3\n\nI predict that ambiguity's counterpart is complication. complexity is ambiguous complication, which I can live with or without. to communicate universally is is to use the smallest necessary amount of complication to eliminate ambiguity\n\nPS [here's what I'm reading](https://app.thestorygraph.com/profile/modestmicah)","I":"I0m>:}}Qa","F":"md","G":1745004413573},{"C":"c6@OpbYC{","A":"futures","D":"futures","E":1745019956288,"H":"[[memory]] echoes past observations in the present, and maybe even gives [[people|personhood]] a sense of [[choice]] and [[future|sequence]]\n\na salient example of future conscience is nervousness: the nervous system is very active during a nervous moment, usually crashing down on the vibes in some way or another, but generating memories of threat or aversive observations from the past only manifesting in the present as apprehension of a hypothetical future. weird! do other species have this experience, or is it just humans? pre1.0 Minecraft really reinforces this experience with the emerging from a cave after night time. Steve is scared of the dark because of zombies, skeletons, and creepers, but also nervous about creepers at the break of dawn, when the urge to go outside is marginal","F":"md","G":1745020076339}],"K":{},"L":false,"M":false,"_":{"A":"name","B":"desc","C":"id","D":"slug","E":"cd","F":"editor","G":"md","H":"content","I":"parent","J":"pages","K":"img","L":"static","M":"published"}}