6B\\2'\\m","A":"metacurriculum ๐","D":"c0","E":1743035564325,"G":"md","H":1750558155018,"F":"[[access is possible|access]]\n โ \n[[this|c0]] is metacurriculum or curriculum index, for limiting the ambiguity of [[syntax]] throughout curricula\n \nmetacurriculum's win condition is [[accessible curriculum|c1#curriculum_is_accessible]]\n
\nmetacurriculum's question is \"can we resolve conflicting access needs?\""},{"C":"I0m>:}}Qa","A":"autocurriculum โค๏ธ","D":"c1","E":1742710603256,"F":"###### curriculum is accessible\nโ \nalignment is possible\n โ \n[[this|c1]] is autocurriculum or curriculum disco, for self observation\n \nautocurriculum's win condition is [[self alignment|c2#you_can_maintain_self_alignment]]\n\nautocurriculum's question is \"who are you?\"","G":"md","H":1750558166034},{"C":"BYKGt0.uF","A":"cocurriculum ๐งก","D":"c2","E":1742711482252,"F":"###### You can maintain self alignment\nโ \ndyadic alignment is possible\n โ \n[[this|c2]] is cocurriculum or curriculum consensus, for social observation\n \ncocurriculum's [win condition](https://tidal.com/browse/track/141262149?u) is [[social alignment|c3#you_can_maintain_dyadic_alignment]]\n\ncocurriculum's question is \"who has personhood?\"","G":"md","H":1750575333790},{"C":"%0w.\"_zAY","A":"polycurriculum ๐","D":"c3","E":1742744789528,"F":"###### You can maintain dyadic alignment\nโ \ncultural alignment is possible\n โ \n[[this|c3]] is polycurriculum or curriculum impulsus, for building and directing collective force\n \npolycurriculum's win condition is [[local alignment|c4#you_can_maintain_big_alignment]]\n\npolycurriculum's question is \"when is the use of force constructive?\"","G":"md","H":1750575137245},{"C":"I!GZg2tz:","A":"hypercurriculum ๐","D":"c4","E":1742754343858,"F":"###### You can maintain big alignment\nโ \nsocietal alignment is possible\n โ \nc4 is hypercurriculum or curriculum memoria, for global alignment\n \nhypercurriculum's win condition is creation of [[unicurriculum]]๐\n\nhypercurriculum's question is \"what did you forget?\"","G":"md","H":1750558210517},{"C":"I(v\"NGECl","A":"assumption","D":"foundation","E":1742708496487,"F":"[[nothing is certain|foundation]] โ [[anything is possible|belief]]\n\nin essence: it is possible that nothing is certain, and if so, it is certain that anything is possible\n \nor: certainty is nonbinary\n \nor, maybe: the only constant is change","H":1750575410206,"G":"md","I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"BA,ynj57b","A":"belief","D":"belief","E":1742708667122,"F":"[[anything is possible|foundation]] [[โ|syntax]] [[observation is possible|memory]]\n\nas is everything else,\n \n[[choice]] is possible,\n \n[[access]] is possible,\n \nand so on; [[memory]] is probably ambiguous, language can accurately describe reality. none of this is guaranteed, or even necessarily true, but it could be","H":1750575100813,"G":"md","I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"QG% !\\fQW","A":"memory","D":"memory","E":1742708847455,"F":"[[observation is possible|foundation]] & [[You]] [recall](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/recall) [memory](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/memory) in the [moment](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/moment) and [observe](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/observe)* it [freely](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/freedom)\n โ \n[[memory is accessible|access]]\n\n*I repeat: anything is possible! Observing memory is one possibility. I generate and then interpret a memory as a moment or sequence of moments, but this is an ambiguous foundation, so from here on out curriculum is ambiguous and unfalsifiable. Read [sense two of the English noun](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/recall) for additional clarity on memory and observation. \n \nPS [consciousness](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/consciousness) is a pretentious word for memory","H":1750552916327,"G":"md","I":"B]WPj<,Eq"},{"C":"B]WPj<,Eq","A":"curriculum","D":"curriculum","E":1742755156533,"F":"curriculum is optional & curriculum is belief exchange: curriculum is a [[sequence]] of [[choice]]s to interpret observation, and translate memory to text based interpretations of beliefs & [[belief changes|foundation]] โ [[curriculum]] is [incoherent](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/incoherent)","G":"md","H":1750575399548,"I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"CK\\tKUPCy","A":"tutorial","D":"tutorial","E":1744136963426,"F":"for an introductory [tour](https://feather.wiki/?page=navigating) of iris, follow links from [[assumptions|foundation]] through the [[curricula|c4]] or see [[index]]. to complete iris, commit all its curriculum to memory\n & \ndisagreement and ambiguity [[disable|access]] [[recall|memory]] โ an accessible way to complete iris is to become its author and adjust it to suit better assumptions and beliefs\n โ \n[Save a copy of this Wiki](https://micah.tips/?page=s), [edit](http://feather.wiki/?page=editing_pages), and [upload](https://feather.wiki/?page=publishing) it to grow the [[scholecule]] to make iris universally accessible","G":"md","H":1750575376890,"I":"/>6B\\2'\\m"},{"C":"t3%z}nXX ","A":"iris","D":"iris","E":1744320465781,"G":"md","H":1750556154486,"F":"assumptions change โ [[iris]] is obsolete\n & \niris is a [Wiki](https://feather.wiki), an [encyclopedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia), and a collection of assumptions, beliefs, and curricula\n\niris is optional. public schools enforce attendance (which is whack) so while attendance is the way through public school, skilling up, paring down, pacing exposure, and embracing ambiguity seems like the way through iris","I":"CK\\tKUPCy"},{"C":"+b$=scvTS","A":"syntax","D":"syntax","E":1743290147715,"F":"[syntax](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/syntax) [arbitrary](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/arbitrary) [subtext](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/subtext) of text\n โ \ntext is the nuclear unit of a [[Page|pagination]]\n โ \nPages is nuclear units of [[curriculum]]: [[curriculum index ๐|c0]] is a nucleus of [[curriculum disco โค๏ธ|c1]] is a nucleus of [[curriculum consensus ๐งก|c2]] is a nucleus of [[curriculum impulsus ๐|c3]] is a nucleus of [[curriculum memoria ๐|c4]] and so on*\n โ \na curriculum is a nucleon of iris, an atomic encyclopedia\n โ \natomic encyclopedias are the nucleons of [[scholecule]]\n\nanything under this line, and most stuff outside the alphabet, mark [hypertext](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hypertext] (which is basically just context), as do capitalized letters, fonts, and links. hypertext can clarify the subtext that is automatically imbued in text. [[links|c0]] without the superscript reference Pages in iris, [links](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNtSAQHNONo) with the superscript reference context beyond iris\n โ \nconditionals connect predictions, stating that if the former is true, the following is also true\n \nampersands and line breaks also connect predictions\n & \nlines of text separate predictions\n
\nPS postscripts are diversions and afterthoughts, disconnected from the rest of the Page","H":1750575435396,"G":"md","I":"CK\\tKUPCy"},{"C":"{bWj[NdVQ","A":"translation","D":"translation","E":1743146623809,"F":"memory is accessible & [[communication can improve certainty|foundation]]\n โ \ncertainty is a skill of interpreting observation\n\nPS certainty is most easily experienced by means of (direct) observation without interpretation & perfectly accurate communication of direct observation is impossible by definition โ [[observation without interpretation is possibly certain|foundation]]","G":"md","H":1750575037411,"I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":"_3J1?e}6h","A":"scholecule","D":"scholecule","E":1744138095420,"F":"[[misalignment is possible|foundation]]\n\n[[curriculum consensus|c3]] & [[access]]\n โ \n[[iris is fungible|tutorial]] in case observers really are plural, separate, and interested in alignment. encyclopedias in discourse is scholecule. scholecule is a platform for boundarycraft and building collective force through study\n \nPS collective force emerges from alignment, which, on this scale, is supported by historical situation (eg. occupied territory โ discuss land acknowledgment), boundarycraft (eg. discuss plans and corresponding access needs), action (eg. discuss encyclopedias, accommodate access needs)","G":"md","H":1750572298070,"I":"%0w.\"_zAY"},{"C":"Dl|Zโ \n#### B\n[[observation is ambiguous|access]]\n โ \n#### C\n[[๐|c0]]โ[[โค๏ธ|c1]]โ[[๐งก|c2]]โ[[๐|c3]]โ[[๐|c4]]โ[[๐|syntax]]","I":"CK\\tKUPCy","G":"md","H":1750556235195},{"C":"c*Rt&lQ&%","A":"You","D":"you","E":1744327383204,"F":"You are [[people]]\n & \nYou believe You are observing [[iris]] โ iris is in Your memory & You agree with its [[assumptions|foundation]]\n\nwhat if communication is the root of misalignment?\n \nPS observer accesses a memory (in breath) โ observer communicates the memory as freely as their memory allows (out breath)","G":"md","H":1750573602743,"I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":"3el'Jl9hu","A":"sequence","D":"sequence","E":1744344878049,"F":"You can only recall a [[memory]] in the present moment\n โ \nthe past is [fake](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/fake#Noun)\n โ \nthe big bang is unfolding & a repeatable memory can be predicted\n\n[[combustion|access]], observed as multiplication and complication, is more observable than addition. look for it! fs.blog explains second order thinking, and, importantly, how to articulate predictions, [here](https://fs.blog/second-order-thinking), which makes [[curriculum disco's win condition|c2#observer_is_correctly_predicting_second_order_consequences]] approachable","G":"md","H":1750573841226,"I":"I0m>:}}Qa"},{"C":" aR-mXfVd","A":"social proof","D":"social_proof","E":1744525736113,"F":"connections between people are inseparable from the context that connects them\n โ \npeople share memories\n\nexample to illustrate shared memory: a coffee date with a girl from a dating app is a coffee date with a girl and the dating app\n โ \ngirl might respond positively or negatively to a joke. social cause and effect can be fun to observe, but a good sense of humour makes it safer. positive social response signals alignment, a respect for shared memory\n โ \nbeing well received is being well received by girl and dating app, not just girl\n","I":"BYKGt0.uF","G":"md","H":1750575310326},{"C":"gsbL&AsWT","A":"people","D":"people","E":1744559119528,"F":"people are observers that makes choices โ people are ethically responsible for the predictable consequences of their choices\n\nchoice and consequence are different from cause and effect only arbitrarily: anything with a sense organ is probably worthy of personhood","I":"BYKGt0.uF","G":"md","H":1750574732469},{"C":"%OYE{EEe|","A":"ethics","D":"ethics","E":1750573339505,"F":"[[people]] are observers who make choices โ observation is a practical foundation for ethics \n โ \nconsequences are traceable to people\n\nthe possibility that I may be the only conscious agent, and everyone around me might be hypnotized automata can take up a lot of memory, but it has no valid implications on power","G":"md","H":1750573450329,"I":"BYKGt0.uF"},{"C":")Q+ _YEi~","A":"access","D":"access","E":1744649654884,"F":"[[memory]] is [accessible](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/access) by way of observation & [[nothing is certain|foundation]]\n โ \n[[observation is ambiguous|c0]]","G":"md","H":1750546876402,"I":"B]WPj<,Eq"},{"C":"kp}q'`a}+","A":"choice","D":"choice","E":1744679049622,"F":"behaviour is as automatic as observation & both are limited by [[access]]\n โ \n[abled](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/abled) [[people]] are free to limit their alignments. this is purely hypothetical: choice is arbitration\n\ncause and effect entails that free will is fake, and choice is mutation, an iteration of evolution. cue and choice substitutes arbitrarily, but preserves the concept of personhood and ethics","I":"I0m>:}}Qa","G":"md","H":1750575360579},{"C":"c6@OpbYC{","A":"time","D":"time","E":1745019956288,"F":"I forget what [[memory]] is\n โ \nmemory gives [[people]] a sense of [[choice]] and [[sequence]]\n\nPS a salient example of future conscience is nervousness: the nervous system is very active during a nervous moment, usually crashing down on the vibes in some way or another, but generating memories of threat or aversive observations from the past only manifesting in the present as apprehension of a hypothetical future. weird! do other species have this experience, or is it just humans? pre1.0 Minecraft really reinforces this experience with the emerging from a cave after night time. Steve is scared of the dark because of zombies, skeletons, and creepers, but also nervous about creepers at the break of dawn, when the urge to go outside is marginal","G":"md","H":1750573165309,"I":"I!GZg2tz:"},{"C":"Um\"u?BTF<","A":"life","D":"life","E":1745904510141,"F":"life is a [[choice]]\n\nI hear [the boundary between life and viruses is also a choice](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/are-viruses-alive-2004/)","I":"I0m>:}}Qa","G":"md","H":1748461503554},{"C":"[+FS|zH\\$","A":"conflict","D":"conflict","E":1747079046061,"F":"[[You can serve transformative justice|foundation]]\n\nConflict bowl is a circle process happening in the midwest. Maybe something like it will work in Victoria! Let's gather for an evening with up to three bowls (or strolls, to limit audience). Nothing is off the table, but I'm going to prioritize low stakes conflicts, to make it as approachable as possible. Take stock of your network: reach out to folks you're in conflict with, invite people who you think might be struggling or interested, or willing to support you. [RSVP](https://tally.so/r/3xEP6E), [take ten minutes to check out the zine](https://medium.com/@camxfree/a-field-guide-to-conflict-bowl-3ae3b0227e20), [join the organizing chatroom](https://signal.group/#CjQKIGrfeI1T7iE4fzGkFJX7qv0Bv9SBUUXj7qtgLoAvENzfEhCG0JUtvsYCBJaXn7Ct75Ua), volunteer to cofacilitate or shadow, and plan succulent, delicious aftercare. This is an experiment that will call for some bravery, skills, and curiosity. Everyone who RSVPs is welcome (except cops)!","G":"md","H":1750572045486,"I":"%0w.\"_zAY"},{"C":"2sS+Jv?0c","A":"pagination","D":"pagination","E":1747081352259,"F":"a [Page](https://feather.wiki/?page=create_a_page) is a case of [[syntax]]\n & \nan atomic encyclopedia has multiple pages โ one Page makes all other pages unobservable\n โ \na Page focuses observation โ distraction and confusion is possible\n\nfinding ways to triage priorities, letting them compete and find symbiotic arrangements offers an answer to autocurriculum's question\n โ \nPages compete for attention but by way of [pagination](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/pagination), which I describe as triage, or [[syntax]] they can begin to reinforce one another in the observer's [[memory]]","G":"md","H":1750558148025,"I":"CK\\tKUPCy"},{"C":"5uQ@9n|1k","A":"thanks","D":"thanks","E":1750556446567,"F":"You RSVP'd for [[conflict bowl|conflict]]\n\nfeel free to amend the RSVP as needed with another submission, and no worries if you can't make it after all :)","G":"md","H":1750572911268}],"K":{},"L":false,"M":true,"N":"[+FS|zH\\$","_":{"A":"name","B":"desc","C":"id","D":"slug","E":"cd","F":"content","G":"editor","H":"md","I":"parent","J":"pages","K":"img","L":"static","M":"published","N":"home"}}